That’s not an opinion. That’s a title. Like Mr. or Mrs. or Ms. (though without an abbreviation yet).
Because it is my sincere religious and philosophical belief that, regardless of what Bigot Nicholas Meriwether may claim to prefer for title and pronouns, his proper title is Bigot, with pronouns of fucker/fuckers.
That is, after all, what fucker asserts Bigot Meriwether should be able to do.
Meriwether, a philosophy professor and devout Christian, sued Shawnee State, claiming that its mandate to use terms that conflict with biology infringed on his religious belief that gender is fixed from the moment of conception.
https://nypost.com/2021/03/27/prof-who-refused-transgender-students-pronouns-wins-in-court/
I also firmly attest that it is my sincere religious and philosophical belief that the same title and pronouns apply to “Judge” Amul Thapar. Bigot Thapar stated “The First Amendment interests are especially strong here because Meriwether’s speech also relates to his core religious and philosophical beliefs,”
If we are to take Bigot Amul Thapar’s interpretation of Bigot Nicholas Meriwether’s case, then both fuckers (remember, I believe that is the appropriate pronoun) must surely agree that all people should write their names as Bigot Amul Thapar and Bigot Nicholas Meriwether all across the internet.
Or they could have used a trans kid’s preferred pronouns and not been fuckers about it.
But, instead, they were jerks about the whole thing.
As I’ve pointed out before, damn near everyone asks me if I prefer “Steve” or “Steven”. It would be rude as hell to find out I preferred one over the other, and then deliberately use the one I didn’t like.
That’s why it’s my firm religious and philosophical belief that everyone should address these fuckers using the title of Bigot, and the pronouns of fucker/fuckers.
And unlike those fucker’s “firmly held religious beliefs”, mine have the evidence of thier actions.
Featured Photo by Divya Agrawal on Unsplash
Hi. I read some ‘journalistic’ responses to the above mentioned court decision, and then I just needed to find something affirming of my feelings. Thank you for your effective blending of anger and humor. Writers supportive of the decision frame this a protecting the free speech of faculty in their teaching and research. I am not convinced that how one addresses a student is genuinely a part of ‘teaching’. The university nor the student objected to content of the course. Seems like whenever I see conservative claims of persecution, it somehow comes down to their right to discriminate, their right to have the world as they wish it to be, despite reality. I work at a university. We are sincerely striving to create a culture of equity and safety at our institution. I really hope that we do not have instructors at my school who cannot find the decency to treat people as they wish to be treated. I also wonder why respect is not valued highly in that f***er’s religious beliefs.
You are very welcome. I’m glad I could provide some small degree of levity in response to fucker’s fuckery!